Calendar: 1848-1849 Page 236
Please note: The digitised calendars in this site have had their contents extracted using OCR (optical character recognition) and as a result, there may be occasional errors in the text. We are working on correcting these errors, but this may take some time.
Page content
THEOLOGICAL DBPARTMBN 19 Who was Aristauis and what is his account ol' the origin of the LXX 20 State some of the reasons for rejecting it 21 Give an account of the ancient editions of the LXX the chief MSS and printed editions 22 The other ancient Greek versions and their date 23 The Italic and the attempts to collect and publish it 24 The origin and date of the Vulgate-the emendations attempted before the Reformation an account of the editions of 1590 and 1592 25 The sense in which Romanist writers take the decree of the Council of Trent respecting the authenticity of the Vulgate Sess iv 26 Prove from the words of our Lord and his Apostles that they regarded the Pentateuch as divine revelation and written by Moses 27 The evidence to the existence and identity of the l'enta- teuch between the time of our Lord and that of the Prophets 28 The direct evidence for the same in the writings of Jeremiah and the period to which his testimony brings us 29 The evidence for the same in the acknowledged writings of David and Solomon and their times 30 Similar evidence from the Song of Deborah and the date of this testimony 31 An outline of the argument founded on these testimonies 32 The nature of Grave9's argument for the genuineness and authenticity of the Pentateuch 33 The difference between Graves's view of the Jewish Ritual and that of Spencer and the proof that the latter is erroneous 34 The objection to the Mosaic miracles from the rebellions of Israel and the answer 35 The proof that the ordinary events in the history of Moses cannot be separated from the miraculous The nature and value of the evidence derived from prophecy
Further information
For further information about this page, please click here to contact us ›